Settlement
avoids London High Court case and will be split with £35m paid directly
to affected individuals and £20m for the Bodo community
• A brief history of oil in Nigeria
The mud stinks and the crabs caught in the swamps around the town of Bodo in the Niger delta still smell of light crude oil.
But the 15,600 Ogoni farmers and fishermen whose lives were
devastated by two large Shell oil spills in 2008 and 2009 will be
celebrating on Wednesday as the company’s Nigerian subsidiary announces a
£55m settlement.
British banks will start to transfer 600,000 naira (about £2,100)
into each of the local people’s accounts and the community will be given
millions to build health clinics and refurbish its schools.
The settlement, split £35m for individuals and £20m for the Bodo
community, avoids Shell having to defend a potentially embarrassing
London high court case which was due to start shortly. It is thought to
be the largest payout to any African community following environmental
damage and the first time that compensation for an oil spill has been
paid directly to affected individuals rather than to local chiefs.
“It’s several years’ earning. I don’t think I have ever seen a happier bunch of people. The minimum wage in Nigeria
is 18,000 naira a month and 70% of the Bodo population live below the
poverty line. Every single one of the 15,600 has said yes to the deal,”
said London lawyer Martyn Day whose team of 20 has just returned from
the delta after negotiating the settlement and helping to set up
thousands of bank accounts for Ogoni people who did not have one.
Shell’s first offer to the Bodo community in 2011 is understood to
have been £4,000. This was raised to £18m in 2013 but was also rejected.
According to Shell, the villagers had demanded £300m for the damage
done.
In a seperate development, the company’s Nigerian subsidiary Shell
Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria (SPDC) said it expected to
start to clean up its pollution in the Bodo fishing grounds and swamps
“within months”. Shell had initially estimated that around 4,000 barrels
of oil were spilt in the two events, but oil experts calculated from
film footage that it could have been 60 times as much. According to
Amnesty International, Shell had intentionally underestimated the spills
in an attempt to minimise compensation payments. This was denied by
Shell.
The company welcomed resolution of the case but blamed oil thieves
for most of the many spills that occur every year in the delta.
read more guardian